Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Chicano Movement - Movement Artifacts

Movement Artifacts
As previously mentioned, there are two primary identities involved in the Mexican American Studies protest in Tucson, Arizona. The first being the TUSD administrators for making the decision to invalidate the MAS program from their high schools; and the second being the Chicano student group known as the UNIDOS that were protesting to protect their ethnic studies. These passionate students found themselves doing research and evaluations of past protest strategies of the Civil Rights Movement to achieve rhetorical victory for themselves. At the same time, the TUSD administrators were working to achieve the same accomplishment and also to save their reputation as professionals in the school setting. The following section will further analyze the UNIDOS use of chaining themselves and chanting in the same board room that TUSD administrators called upon Tucson Police Department (TPD) for security on April 26th as forms of movement artifacts.
The scene started off when nine students heard of the board meeting that was going to take place with all Tucson Unified School District administrators to discuss the rapid decision of state superintendent Tom Horne to remove MAS. Already ignited with anger and frustration the UNIDOS decided they would make an appearance that was going to have their voices essentially be heard by the school board. Since board meetings were open to the community, the students began to invite and inform others of their plan to invade the meeting and find themselves a seat that no one else could take from them. Some of the TUSD educators caught glimpse of this plan and helped the district administrators seek help from the Tucson Police Department to prepare for the worst case scenario.
Upon the morning of April 26, 2011, the UNIDOS made their first move right as the doors opened. Running into the facility with chains wrapped around their wrists and interlocked within one another, the nine UNIDOS were able to move past police officers, board room security guards, and Tucson Unified School District staff (Cabrera). Battling shoves and dodging the screaming threats of officials, these board room warriors were able to sit in solidarity against the TUSD administrators (Cabrera). Once they were able to settle in their seat and chain themselves to the chairs, the UNIDOS raised their linked wrists and smiled at the crowd with great cultural pride. They proceeded to show enthusiasm and dedication to their protest by chanting in unison, “Our education is under attack. What do we do? Fight back!” (Cabrera). Not only did those nine students gain respect from their peers, they gained support from parents, family, and friends that were also part of the cultural community of Tucson.
On the other side of the fence, the Tucson Unified School District found it in their best interest to reach out to the Tucson Police Department for help with the situation at hand. TPD found it necessary to respond by providing K-9 units, bomb squad patrol officers, and a hovering helicopter (Cabrera) to observe the outside area. Inside of the school boardroom, security was hired to prevent students from passing the doors to find seats before administrators. As seen in Three Sonorans News, “Unidos take over TUSD school board” (2011), two grown men dressed as security and possibly TPD took on several high school students with strong force but lost the scuffle as the UNIDOS outnumbered them as they charged ahead into their seats. Michael Hicks amongst other board members witnessed first-hand that, “The meeting [was] cancelled, no vote [took] place, and the students [were] victorious!” (Three Sonorans News).
Looking closely at the identities of UNIDOS and TUSD administration, a clear divide occurred that shocked the community and resulted in unanimity for most people. The UNIDOS found a sense of identity within one another which reflects the meaning of their name “UNIDOS.” From Spanish to English, “unidos” translates to “united” which happens to be the first word in their name’s acronym, United Non-Discriminatory Individuals Demanding Our Studies (Cabrera). The founders of this student-led group, UNIDOS, are all Chicanos and pride themselves in learning and sharing stories of heritage, traditions, and survival ways of living with their peers, family, and community. Mexican American Studies does not only provide historical knowledge, it provides confidence to the normally marginalized group of Chicano students (Meier and Stewart). Thus, by the UNIDOS chaining themselves to their seats and chanting words that show how bound they are to their ethnic studies, their motive becomes clear; by saving their ethnic studies, they were saving themselves from education system failure.
As for the Tucson Unified School District administrators, their professionalism as policy makers was challenged during the protest as they continually showed dismissive behavior towards the demands of their Chicano students. Leaders within this identity such as Tom Horne, John Huppenthal, and Michael Hicks, refused to address the issue with the UNIDOS via open dialogue at the school board meeting on April 26th (Three Sonoran News). Tucson Unified School District only showed unity with the Tucson Police Department (Cabrera) which further demonstrated their lack of connection with their students leaving them in no place to properly make or destroy a policy with a one-sided perspective. Consequently, without any school district administrator releasing a statement or rebuttal to the rhetorical actions of the UNIDOS, silence was taken heavily and triumph was seen to be of the Chicano students and not of TUSD.
To conclude this section, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of the movement articles used by the UNIDOS and TUSD. For the Chicano students in the UNIDOS group, the use of chains and their chant was extremely effective because they were able to gain two things from it. One being community support and the second being a voice that would finally be heard their TUSD administrators. These two artifacts really tied into their identity as Chicano students because they showed their district administrators that they were taking responsibility of their education and success in the classroom by protesting the decision to remove Mexican American Studies from their schools. Tucson Unified School District only used the Tucson Police Department as a movement artifact which ended up dwindling their effectiveness and success. Nevertheless, TUSD administrators lost community support and reliability as policy makers for their district since they failed to show interest in the needs and wants of their students. Their movement artifact tied to their identity because as local authoritative figures, TUSD administrators sought out help from other authoritative figures to help maintain status and protection under the law.

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Section 1
      1. I think it is very clear and easy to read. The fluency from one paragraph to the other makes it easy to navigate through your paper. As a side note, I did appreciate your two-dimensional topic here. Not only did you address the students and their rhetorical strategy, but you also looked at the many different ways these strategies could be observed and the efforts to prevent such protest.
      2. I believe the paper does attend to the artifact’s immediate rhetorical situation; from my understanding, your artifact analysis is targeting the specific protest of the Chicano student group or (UNIDOS) invading the TUSD administration board room. However, I am a little confused in terms of what direction you were taking your paper. I was not sure whether or not you were talking about each individual identity of UNIDOS and TUSD or the board room protest as a whole. I would recommend sticking to one idea and just running with it using the TUSD reputation as an obstacle in the UNIDOS protest to achieve a better education… if that makes any sense.
      3. Your paper does address the artifacts rhetorical strategy for the most part. I would like to know why this particular protest was so influential in the outcome of the voting in the school board meeting and why they thought chaining themselves to the chairs would be most impactful. Also if the TUSD wanted to represent themselves as enforcers, why did they not just carry on with the board meeting despite the efforts of the children? Also I think that the background of the name UNIDOS would be more to do with the rhetorical analysis than the artifact analysis.
      Section 2
      1. Your paper does create a coherent whole, I just get a little confused because sometimes I am unable to depict which rhetorical situation you are targeting. Is it the identities of each group, or the board room protest?
      2. Your transition from one paragraph to the other is very fluent. I did not have difficulty navigating through your paper.
      3. My only thoughts in terms of better understanding your paper would be more to do with the TUSD. Why would the board work so hard to silence the voices of the students?
      Section 3
      1. I think the artifact analysis has a lot going on and while I personally think that some of the characters in the text can be contributed to the artifact, I think there is a lot here that could more so belong to the rhetorical analysis.
      2. The goal is obvious in terms of you analysis so that is good, I am more concerned with your execution of this goal. I think you have a lot of ideas and a lot of information going on in your text, so definitely finding the right idea and backing that up with specific analytical points would really help the paper. Overall however, its great!
      3. I think the identity is very clear in your context and it’s play on the issue of the protest and that disconnection between the characters is a smart analytical move, just make sure it does not dominate the main idea of the paper and draw away from the true goal.
      4. Again, the identity and the background of the historical context really amps of the reader to prepare and fully understand the material in your drafts.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Saphire!

    1. The artifact analysis itself:

    • I like the idea of using many artifacts for each identity. The only problem is that I wasn’t sure what exactly those artifacts were before reading the last paragraph (where it is made really clear). I think that you should focus in more on your artifacts in this section, and explain the ethos, pathos, and logos for each artifact. That will really make it clear to your audience what you are trying to analyze and subsequently argue.
    • Chronologically, it is organized very well. It’s clear what the protest consisted of. But this feels like more historical context and less like rhetorical context surrounding these artifacts.
    • This all not to say that you should get rid of/change the stuff you have! I think it’s really important to the artifacts themselves that you explain fully how they were used. I would suggest adding to this section instead of rewriting.

    2. The artifact analysis with the context sections:

    • You do a great job of keeping the entire paper cohesive and smooth. The introduction to this section fits well with the conclusion of your last section. If you wanted to, I think you could keep the organization of the paper as is (historical, rhetorical, and artifact). It probably makes the most sense in your case.

    3. Looking forward: what would you expect the conclusion to include?

    • We talked about this a little in class on Wednesday, but I think your conclusion should include the efficacy of your protest. How did the protest end and were there other key events that happened after the protest you have focused on here?
    • If there are other protests like this one, where education for Chicanos is defunded, how did they end? Were they affected by/did they affect this protest?

    ReplyDelete