Purpose: This
paragraph is intended to prove that the division between two groups created by
the Vaccine Debate (anti-vaccine and pro-vaccine), is creating a problem for
schools and the transmission of diseases amongst students.
A strong divide remains
to this day between those
in support of vaccinations and those in opposition to vaccinations. While this feud continues, more
people choose not to vaccinate their children. Just two years ago, a few Los Angeles schools had
“up to 60 to 70 percent of parents” refusing to vaccinate their children using
a personal belief
exemption (Khazan). To the dismay of the remaining 30 to 40 percent of parents who did have
their children vaccinated, “A community can only be protected when 92 percent
or more of a population is immunized” (Khazan). Therefore, as the anti-vaccination movement
continues to grow, protection from infectious diseases through vaccination
becomes less and less effective. Consequently, the outcome of this debate will have a profound
outcome on the spread of
communicable diseases and the health of American citizens.
Characters
that should be the focus of the paragraph:
·
Divide/debate/feud.
·
Those
in support/opposition
·
Personal
belief exemptions
·
Spread
of communicable diseases
Rewrite:
The divide between pro-vaccine and
anti-vaccine movements has created conflict amongst parents of school-aged
children. This conflict is fueled by mandatory vaccination laws, which imply
explicit government support of vaccinations. In the past, personal belief
exemptions provided loopholes for parents who did not vaccinate their children.
In fact, “up to 60 to 70 percent of parents” in the Los Angeles area alone used
these exemptions to avoid immunizations for various personal reasons. Although many
of these exemptions are valid reasons to avoid vaccines, they defeat the
purpose of vaccines when used in abundance. To be truly successful, vaccines
need to be used by “92 percent or more of a population” (Khazan). By requiring
the vaccination of the majority of school-aged children, mandatory vaccination
laws reduce the spread of communicable diseases.
|
Topic Position
|
Stress
Position
|
|
The divide
between pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine movements
|
has created
conflict amongst parents of school-aged children.
|
|
This conflict
|
is fueled by
mandatory vaccination laws, which imply explicit government support of
vaccinations.
|
|
In the past,
personal belief exemptions
|
provided
loopholes for parents who did not vaccinate their children. In fact, “up to
60 to 70 percent of parents” in the Los Angeles area alone used these
exemptions to avoid immunizations for various personal reasons.
|
|
Although many
of these exemptions are valid reasons to avoid vaccines
|
, they defeat
the purpose of vaccines when used in abundance.
|
|
To be truly
successful, vaccines
|
need to be
used by “92 percent or more of a population” (Khazan).
|
|
By requiring
the vaccination of the majority of school-aged children,
|
mandatory
vaccination laws reduce the spread of communicable diseases.
|
Topic sentence:
The divide
between pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine individuals in the United States has infiltrated
the school system, creating issues for parents on both sides of divide.
No comments:
Post a Comment