Julian
Aronfeld
Artifact
Analysis
The protest that surrounds Widerstand seems like a very important
and timeless display of German resistance. This becomes even more obvious when
one looks at the artifacts of protest from the movement itself, and how those
artifacts shaped the protest’s goals and identity. There were multiple origins
of resistance because there were multiple identities tied to the protest
itself, but the most impactful part of the resistance was literature, since
military resistance “proved almost useless” (Brysac). Among the most important
literature that surrounded the resistance are the White Rose Society’s
pamphlets and the Tarnschriften (hidden
message) advertisements pamphlets that were in circulation in Germany. Though
they both align with the same goals, their functions and overall purposes
proved to be very different.
The White Rose Society was founded
by two Communist siblings, Hans and Sophie Scholl, in the Ludwig Maximillian
University. Among its ranks were Christians and Jews alike, all Communists who
disliked Hitler’s fascist regime and wanted to bring justice to the German
people. They began the Society for the express purpose of “gathering intel…
distributing dissent” about Hitler and the Third Reich (Brothers). The society
became a huge catalyst for swaying German opinion about Hitler when they began
the distribution of flyers. The White Rose Flyers were distributed in a way
similar to the Federalist Papers of colonial America. They “discreetly handed
out flyers, labeled with a White Rose”, each issue containing a new perspective
on Hitler’s regime and the German people’s identity (Brysac).
The leaflets are filled with
arguments for the preservation of the German identity, as well as the call to dissent
Hitler. The first flyer is a public shaming of Germans, as it refers to the
Germans under Hitler as “spineless… shameful… corrupted and spiritually
crushed” (WRS #1)[i].
These words were not just meant to hurt the feelings of the Germans who read it
for the sake of hurting their feelings. It is meant to compare the Germans of
that generation to those of previous, and shame Germans for being sheep “blindly
following their seducers into ruin” (WRS LoR)[ii].
Its purpose is to insult the identity of a few Germans in order to preserve the
identity of all Germans. White Rose Society argues that Germany has become “a
civilized nation allowing itself to be governed without opposition by an
irresponsible clique” (WRS #1). The leaflets don’t directly mention or
articulate for a Communist identity, as the German identity is the one targeted
in their arguments. This is most likely because it will reach a wider range of
people, as well as reflecting the goals of the Society, which is to introduce
opposing opinion to Hitler for the sake of the German people.
The White Rose Society leaflets are
primarily meant to preserve the German identity and dissent Hitler, but the
arguments present in their literature shows a secondary goal; a call to arms.
The leaflets distributed by White Rose are artifacts of protest, simply because
of this goal. They hope to bring about change in Germany by calling German
people to the resistance. This goal reflects the protest as a whole, and
articulates the identity of all Germans who want to change Germany, not just
the general prideful German identity. The pamphlets literally “Call to all
Germans” in order to bring about the necessary permanent change (WRS LoR). This
change is meant to be permanent, which is evident by the leaflet’s mention of
future generations of Germans and their fates. German’s probably don’t “want
[them] and [their] children to suffer the same fate as the Jews”, which is
exactly what this leaflet argues will happen if they don’t stand up and make a
change (WRS LoR). They make the argument that if Germans don’t listen and let
Hitler’s regime go either forgotten, or even worse, accepted, then history is
doomed to repeat itself with the German people. This is a very impactful
argument, as it highlights the importance of heeding the Society’s warnings,
with the consequences befalling not the German people or even the Jews, but
their children and all generations to follow.
Similar to the White Rose Society’s
leaflets, yet differing in goals and purpose, were the Tarnschriften[iii]pamphlets
that were produced and distributed by the Red Orchestra Communist resistance
group. These leaflets were formatted a bit differently the White Rose
Society’s, and were arguably more effective. These pamphlets were Nazi intel
and resistance jargon disguised as advertisements for products. The
advertisements were often circulated in larger, more central cities, where
obvious anti-Nazi propaganda would be easily spotted. This needed to be a quick
and easy way to distribute dissent; which it was, as the Red Orchestra “cornered
the market on…Nazi resistance literature” (Brysac). Most ads began with a
general statement about the Nazi’s brutality and evil methods. They would then
go on to explain the general statement, and follow it up with some kind of way
the people could resist.
These pamphlets reflect an identity for
the resistance; the identity of the underground resistance, which is
distinguishable from the White Rose’s German preservation. By hiding anti-Nazi
propaganda within disguised advertisements, the Red Orchestra was doing
something more than the White Rose. They were being overtly deceptive. These
ads were designed to be distributed right under the Nazi’s noses, rather than
in complete secrecy. This deception was an underlying method for these
particular pieces of propaganda. It allowed for a much wider range of audience.
The hidden advertisements also had a
differing purpose from White Rose. The Tarnschriften
was a vessel for intel and Nazi smear campaign. While White Rose pamphlets were
persuasive, Tarnschriften was more descriptive,
based more on information than argument. Rather than trying to convince Germans
to “disassociate [themselves] with Nazis”, the point here was to inform, like
when “Hitlerreglerung in den tagen von
27. bis 30. oktober de jahres aber zehntausend juden polnischer
staatsangehorigkeit, darunter viele, die selt jahrzehnten in deutschland
ansassig warren, verhaftet”[iv]
(WRS #2; Tarnschraften)[v].
It was this kind of message that the producers of Tarnshcraften were trying to get to the German people in order to
create a crack in the hierarchy. One big part of Hitler’s regime was the
totalitarian attitude, where expressed dissent was punishable by death; even
influential Germans. With this method of resistance, “even German actors and
writers had access” to particular information about the very Nazi regime that
was helping them stay famous (Brysac). The more influential the person, the
more potential they had for helping turn the public opinion around. It was
persuasive by proxy; not persuasive writing in itself, but had the persuasive
effect on people.
The Widerstand
literature was a strong indicator of the resistance’s goals. They included
different types of resistance with differing purposes, all with the express
goal of turning the public’s opinions around. They each represent an important
identity for protesters from Nazi Germany, whether they sought to protect
German identity or introduced a new one into the resistance. Whatever the case
is, White Rose and Red Orchestra are staples in German protest literature,
because they represent possibly the most important and memorable protest
Germany has ever had.
[i]
WRS is the White Rose Society, the # indicates which flyer is being referred
to.
[ii]
LoR – Leaflet of Resistance; not numbered but titled.
[iv]
The pamphlet is in German; a rough translation of this is “Hitler’s regime, on
the days between October 27-30, this year (1941), arrested and prosecuted tens
of thousands of Jews of Polish nationality under the public’s nose”
[v]
This example of Tarcnschraften was
disguised as Excentric Shampoo, and
is a perfect example of distributed Nazi intel.
1.I thought that overall, the organization of your essay was both insightful and logical. I also thought you did a good job of explaining the rhetorical situation, and I felt as though the goals were expressed well in your paper.
ReplyDelete2. I also felt that the transitioning between your paragraphs was good, and with that your essay came out as a "whole", not simply separate sections. However, there where some things that I feel might need some clarification. For instance, you make mention of the "Federalist papers of colonial America", but what where those papers. You mention how your artifact was distributed like, but if your readers aren't American, would they know about the "federalist papers"?
3. For your conclusion on your paper, not necessarily this essay, I would definitely be interested in knowing just how successful your protest was, or if you thought it wasn't. If not, then why? Also, do you think that groups such as The White Rose Society and their rhetoric helped shape similar protests, and how?
Based on the work that I've seen, I think you're a really strong writer. There is one sentence that could be written a little bit more care, which is the third sentence of the third paragraph
ReplyDelete"These words were not just meant to hurt the feelings of the Germans who read it for the sake of hurting their feelings."
I don't know if it is absolutely necessary in the analysis, but it could be a good supplement to the analysis you've provided to talk about rhetorical strategies used in the pamphlets, from talking about how they were disseminated, to how they were presented--what they physically looked like and what it implies. For example, are these guys educated or is there reason to believe they're total lunatics? Was this presented in a way that made them look official? (Both questions serve as ethos) It might not be relevant, but would give readers a deeper understanding of their significance in the protest, especially if they were a threat to Nazism.
It also feels like you're giving an overview of the protest artifacts, which is great and totally helpful and necessary, but for sake of the analysis, it seems like it would be important to talk about how these things were able to matter and affect the protest, or the rhetoric surrounding the protest.
ReplyDelete