Natalie Polston
Dr. Brown
ENGL 306
7 April 2016
Historical Context
The Purple
Rain Protest took place in Cape Town, South Africa on September 2nd,
1989. While apartheid in South Africa had been prevalent for many years, it
came to a culmination on that day and made a profound statement about the
majority’s attitude about apartheid. South African history is unique in that it
is often referred to as the “most protest-rich country in the
world" (CIA World Factbook). The Purple Rain Protest occurred in a historical
and political context in which protest was not only necessary, but also common.
Coming out of hundreds of years of oppression, the protesters’ position stands
as one that had been held by many, across numerous centuries.
Oppression has been interwoven in
the history of South Africa by European colonization as early as the 17th
Century (Crais 31). Portuguese, British, Dutch, and French colonizers were
interested in South Africa for its lucrative resources such as spices and
minerals (Crais 35). They engaged in and initiated numerous wars with South
African indigenous peoples in attempts to thwart their land. British forces
were ultimately successful in obtaining land and power due to their advanced
military strength and techniques. The indigenous South Africans were
continually subjugated by various European settlers, therefore creating the
attitudes and habits that would eventually lead to apartheid (Feinberg).
After years of Europeans fighting
over who would get the land in South Africa, Great Britain prevailed and the
British Commonwealth obtained South Africa and deemed it the Union of South
Africa in 1910 (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica). During that time, the
country formed a congress, giving the government greater autonomy and
legitimacy (O’Meara). With the election of a new prime minister, 1924 brought
the first stint of power held by the National Party (The Editors of
Encyclopædia Britannica). The National Party is defined by its favor to white
South Africans, as well as its emphasis on separation of races within the
country. At the onset of World War II, however, the Party fell out of power,
only to resurface later (O’Meara).
By the beginning of the 20th
Century, much of blacks’ land was controlled by the white minority. This is
shown by the fact that at that time, natives owned only 7% of the land in South
Africa (Feinberg). 1948 brought new rule to South Africa: the National Party
(Beinart 166). In its rule, this party enforced the attitudes and regulations
of segregation created by European rule in the colonial era. The root of the
Purple Rain Protest lies in the power of the National Party. Apartheid was
created and enforced by the National Party and grew the policy during their
time of power.
In order to understand what the
protesters were concerned with, it is vital to understand the implications of
the policy of apartheid. In Afrikaans, apartheid translates to “apartness” (The
Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica). In
essence, apartheid is sanctioned racial segregation. It allows for whites in
South Africa to dominate political, educational, and economic arenas, while any
nonwhites are discriminated against. Interestingly, whites are the minority
race in South Africa, comprising only around 20% of the country (Beinart 280).
In effect, apartheid separated South Africa by race, and then divided them
spatially. Clearly, this presented a huge problem for the non-white majority.
In regard to the location of the
protest, Cape Town is the one of three capitals of South Africa, and serves as
the legislative capital of the country (MacKinnon 315). It is the 6th
largest city in the country, but is the city with the most political presence
(Statistics South Africa). Protesters gathered in Cape Town because that’s
where the political leaders of the time would have been—they entered into that
space in order to be heard. Because of its proximity to political action and
proceedings, Cape Town is the site of many important South African protests (Goedertier).
It is significant to recognize
South Africa’s history and continuing culture of protest (Lodge and Mottiar 7).
Protest as a method for change and the attitudes associated with it carry even
into recent events, with prominent protests occurring as recently as early 2016
(CNN). Formerly, these sorts of rebellions would manifest themselves in war
(Crais 32). So, the desire for change has always existed on the part of the
oppressed—since the beginnings of colonization, non-white South Africans have
fought against their oppressors. However in the late 20th and early
21st centuries, protest has become the vehicle for voicing these
demands for change.
The Purple
Rain Protest serves as a sort of hinge for South African social and political change.
There are hundreds of years of oppression that lead up to it: from colonization
by Europeans all the way to apartheid and post-apartheid segregation and
discrimination. Subsequently, the events following even 30 years after the
protest show that protest as a political form grew following the Purple Rain
Protest. It is a marker of both what had gone before and what was to come in
the future of South Africa (Archer and Stent).
1.I think you explain what apartheid is, and in that definition you specify that it's non-whites and that those non-whites are the majority, but if I remember correctly there are specific names for the different classes of Blacks in South Africa at this time, so being more clear about who they are.
ReplyDelete2. Definitely a fan of the world factbook. I think one thing you could benefit from is having primary sources used as secondary sources, like publications of newspapers in South Africa or from international groups (like the UN) that show the reaction to the state of affairs and to the protest at that time.
3. I think comparing it to segregation is a good start, because (usually) people in the American context can conceptualize that sort of oppression, but I think you should go into specifics about the South African Apartheid, like areas that Blacks couldn't go to, etc.
4. Some of the material you present (like how protests were common in this time and how Cape Town was an important location) is more rhetorical context (i.e. why they did what they did as a strategy) than it was historical. I think referencing specific events would help clarify that.
Bonus: There wasn't a clear connection. I still don't know the significance of the color purple (although that might show up in your rhetorical context) and as I said earlier, explaining why they protested the way they did and how demonstrations were common in that time, and whether they're effective.
1. I think that after reading your historical context twice, I could definitely understand who the protest participants were in general, however, to a reader just looking into this paper it was not made super clear on who the specific protest participants were.
ReplyDelete2. I would say that she pulled solid sources, both relevant and more historical links, that really helped to explain her historical context. I think it would be helpful to pull a source that has a really good direct quote or really good direct quote of information for you to use within the historical context paragraphs. You had good sources, but I think you could use more sources and pull more specific quotes information from them.
3. I think what you need to do to make the paper more understandable for someone with no prior knowledge is to be much more specific and go into more detail. Also take out some of the parts that are borderline rhetorical, use that in the next section instead. But who were they key players in this protest? How did the protests originally start? What/where was the first protest? How did it develop to where it is now? Your historical context was good, but too much of a general overview, you need more specific detail and need to critically go way more in depth.
4. I would suggest to go back and add details in between sentences, and then I would also suggest that you take out the rhetorical parts and move them to the rhetorical context section. Also get more solid sources and quote directly from them into your paper-this is technically a research paper, so much citing of sources is needed to create a convincing research paper and argument.
5. Natalie, I get what you were trying to do in terms of connecting the historical and political context, but at this point, it is not clear in your writing. Again, it is to general and broad and does not clearly connect the parallels within the text. I think your argument and details need to be clearer, and then it will be easier to connect the two. Also you need to explain the political aspects of the movement and protests much more, right now I am not seeing much for political evidence so you need to add more before you could successfully and clearly connect them.