Monday, February 29, 2016

"I Am Woman, Hear Me Roar"


Natalie Polston
Dr. Brown
ENGL306
23 February 2016

“I Am Woman, Hear Me Roar”
            The year 1975 was met by the United Nations declaring it International Women’s Year, and its anthem: “I Am Woman.” Written and performed by Helen Reddy, the song serves as a marker of the development of Women’s Liberation (Women’s Lib) in the 1970s. While former movements focused on women’s voting rights and citizenship, 1970s feminism honed in on women’s rights over their bodies, equal pay, and similar issues. Much of the work of this movement needed to stem from awareness. This is why Helen Reddy’s classic song was well timed and well-said. Her anthem serves to prove the power of women not only in the music industry, but also on the world stage.
            Looking at women’s rights in the United States today, it may be difficult for some to believe that women were previously more oppressed than now. For example, contraception was once illegal. Progressions such as legalization of contraception were the result of tough fights fought by strong women. However, with fresh challenges and a remaining list of inequalities, the women of the 1970s were faced with unique and intimidating obstacles. Those who were part of Women’s Lib chose their first mode of action: to make others aware of the oppression that was still occurring. They set out to “[break] the silences which were so pervasive” (Stopper 75). If people could be aware of what was happening, they may be much more susceptible to joining the fight against it. Reddy’s goal of awareness is clear in the lyrics
I am woman, hear me roar
In numbers too big to ignore
And I know too much to go back an' pretend
'Cause I've heard it all before
And I've been down there on the floor
No one's ever gonna keep me down again.
Here, it’s clear that her conviction is that if everyone, particularly women, knew full what they were going through, they wouldn’t be able to go back to old ways. It’s evident that awareness is a large portion of the work this song sought to achieve.
            The 1970s were a time where women got a lot of attention—and that was no accident. With major court cases like Roe v. Wade taking place in the early 1970s, it makes sense that the United States would be more tuned in to the rights of women. “I Am Woman” gained its popularity just two years after the Roe v. Wade decision, while the country’s head was still turned in that direction. Reddy certainly utilized kairos in that her song fell on the world’s ears at the right moment in time. It was a song known to bring women “much needed clarity and inspiration” (Arrow 213). In a time where, even after much progress, women were still oppressed, “I Am Woman” catalyzed motivation to carry on.
            In past women’s movements, women have been forced to go against popular culture. Equality of women was not a popular idea, and therefore women had to step outside of culture in order to be heard. However, with mass media growing in the 1970s, along with it grew accessibility to new ideas. By and large, Women’s Lib tried to take hold of the media and “the rise of cultural studies from the late 1970s saw a less adversarial relationship develop between feminism and popular culture” (Arrow 215). By joining an already established institution of popular culture, Reddy utilized ethos. While mass media still enforced gender inequality, Reddy saw the power it had to influence minds.
            Though 1970s feminists were only beginning to take hold of some of the power encapsulated in mass media, this new mindset was severely underrepresented in music. According to Reddy, at the time there were no female empowerment songs. She commented, “I finally realized I was going to have to write the song myself because it simply didn’t exist. And that was the genesis of ‘I Am Woman’. It was my statement as a feminist” (Reddy, in Gaar 1992, 122). Not only was the song significant for Reddy personally, it stood as a reference point—breaking the ground for feminism to be represented in music. Even through her Grammy win, Helen Reddy stood tall as a “superstar and feminist” (Wells 1973, 25). She used her celebrity to grow her activism, rather than shrinking back for fear of reproach.
            The song’s lyrics are powerful and evocative. Riveting lines such as, “Oh yes I am wise, but it's wisdom born of pain,” are sentiments to which all women can relate. The song spoke for a national feeling had by women that hadn’t yet been articulated in music. The song utilizes pathos in both the lyrics and the music itself. Particularly enthralling are the last lines of the song: “I am invincible, I am strong, I am woman.” Words like these are utterly empowering, and show women in a different light. She reminded her audience that being a woman is something to be proud of—women are shrouded in this irrevocable strength and resilience. The music of the song grows as Reddy proudly belts, “I am woman, hear me roar.” The tune is simple, and the chorus is catchy as to be easily learned by any who listen.
Reddy effectively put feelings into words, because “for many women, listening to ‘I Am Woman’ was a way of connecting with some of the goals of feminism as they were articulated in popular culture, especially taking pride in womanliness, and female economic independence” (Arrow 223). In many cases, it gave women a new way to think about men, one another, and themselves (Arrow 226). In a cultural world where women’s voices were silenced frequently, “I Am Woman” was a banner and reference point—not only for women but also for men. It’s clear that her audience is broad when, in the song, she has a “long long way to go, until I make my brother understand.”
“I Am Woman” created and defined what was a feminist anthem. More than that, it was a source of simultaneous comfort and empowerment for women in the 1970s and beyond. In a time when women were denied of much, this song allowed them to celebrate the glory of being a woman, regardless of how she is treated. Yet in that, Reddy reminded women that they need not accept whatever treatment others give them—therefore spurring on the Women’s Liberation movement of the 1970s. She used a major part of culture to change the culture, at the opportune time, and with the most fitting words.


Works Cited

Arrow, Michelle. "‘It Has Become My Personal Anthem’." Australian Feminist Studies 22.53 (2007): 213-30. JSTOR. Web.

Sink, Nancy. "Women's Liberation Movement." Women's Liberation Movement. N.p., Dec. 2008. Web.

Stopper, Anne, and Marianne Hartigan. "The Catalyst for Women's Lib." Books Ireland 284 (2006): 75. JSTOR. Web.

5 comments:

  1. Hi Natalie,
    I like the object you chose, but I have a few suggestions about the clarity of your essay. First of all, I initially found it somewhat difficult to read the first sentence of your essay. I think all of the pronouns complicated the flow of the sentence and as a whole it did not capture my attention as a reader. Secondly, I am somewhat confused about the audience of this object. In the first paragraph you mention that the purpose is “awareness,” but I’m not sure who is being made aware. Does the song speak to men or fellow women?
    In the second paragraph, I thought the example of the availability of contraception was interesting, but I think you need to take this a little further for it to be effective. Perhaps you should explain how denying women contraception infringed upon their rights. Also in paragraph two, you mention how women have “unique and intimidating obstacles.” I think this would be a good point to go ahead and list these obstacles and describe how they are unique to women. You could put this statement immediately before your example of contraception and that would help the paragraph flow.
    In the fourth paragraph (not including the song lyrics), you mentioned Roe v. Wade. I think that this would be a more compelling example if you preluded it with a description of the court case and what came of it. How did it impact women? Was it beneficial to women?
    In the last sentence of paragraph four you characterized the song itself as a catalyst. I thought this was a really creative choice. As a science major I saw this word and it immediately caught my attention.
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I didn’t see a second thesis to introduce your discussion on ethos, pathos, and logos. I think a second thesis would be really helpful to lead into this discussion from the first section of the paper.
    Finally, I think the topic sentence for paragraph 8 beginning “Reddy effectively put…” is somewhat overwhelming because it’s so long. I think it would be better to separate this sentence into two distinct sentences. The first may establish the topic of the paragraph, and the second could include the quote as a form of support/evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Natalie,
    I do like the overall message of your paper and you are tackling a subject that is relevant to todays culture. Overall, you do a good job getting your point across but there could be a few things to help make this a solid piece of writing.
    First, I am primarily questioning who your audience is. Is this paper to men about women's rights, or is to women reiterating the rights that they deserve? I think if that is established early on, it will make it easier for your reader to identity who you want to persuade. If I were you, I would make the audience women, not only because you are a woman, but because the grader of this essay is a woman and it would be easier for her to connect to the writing if it was directed towards her.
    Second, there were a few points in the essay where you make assumptions rather than having evidence to back you up. For example, in paragraph six you explain that the lyrics gave women empowerment and a different light. Explain that more with specific examples and that will benefit you in the persuasion of your audience. Also, during the Roe v. Wade case, explain what the result towards women. Was is bad? Was it good? Then, give examples of the lives of women after the case was settled.
    Third, I personally did not feel persuaded to read the entire paper after the first paragraph. Your intro paragraph provides a lot of background information which is good, but I would focus on the oppression of women. Explain the differences of men and women specifically. You touch the subject, but if you dug deeper I think that it would engage your audience for the entire paper.
    Lastly, this is a really good start to your paper and you have set yourself up well for the final draft. Your edits might come from the macro and micro levels. Mainly from the micro levels, but there could be a few structural changes that could happen in your paper.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Natalie,

    1. I agree with Sydney when she said that the contraception example is good, but probably needs to be explained more fully. I would recommend explaining the part where you state, “tough fights fought by strong women.” This feels to me like the most vague part of the sentence. If you found a source to back up your claim, I think that it would help this part of the essay tremendously.
    2. I like that you italicized your purpose, I think it makes it stand out really well. The intended audience was less clear until I got to the last sentence of your second to last paragraph. You state the audience there very plainly, so I think this should be moved up from the rhetorical strategies part and into the rhetorical situation part. Backing up your audience claim with a quote is also really well done here, so I would definitely keep that.
    3. Your pathos argument is very good. But for your ethos argument, I’m not sure it is quite as strong. In fact, your first ethos argument sounds more like kairos to me, than it does ethos. The fact that popular culture was accessible and also open minded when it came to feminism is all about timing and less about the credibility. Your second ethos paragraph is much better in terms of showing how Reddy was a credible figure to her audience.
    4. The second part of your essay needs a thesis. By telling the reader which rhetorical strategies you will be talking about, I think it will make your paper much more clear and concise.
    5. I think your paper would be a little stronger if you gave just a bit more background on the struggles of women before Reddy’s song. If you quoted directly from a source speaking to the hardships that women faced, I think it would be clearer as to why Reddy felt that it was so necessary to write her song.
    6. In your paragraph about kairos, your last sentence says “’I am woman’ catalyzed motivation to carry on” and this sounds to me like a second purpose. So perhaps did the song have a dual purpose: To make people more aware about the inequality and also to spur more women into action? If so, I would comment on this second purpose earlier in the paper, just so that the reader understands exactly what you are arguing for.
    7. Overall, I think your paper has a really great starting structure! Your object is very clearly defined and so is your movement. Most of your revisions will be at the paragraph level, so these are definitely micro revisions. It was really interesting, great job!

    Libby

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Revision plan:
    1. Most importantly, I need to add a second thesis for ethos, pathos, and logos discussion
    2. Identify audience (mine and Reddy’s)—in doing so, I can focus in on who I’m persuading, therefore informing my evidence and points.
    3. Go further with Roe v. Wade—explanation of what the case was and what it did for women, then go further with contraception example and explain what and why.
    a. effects on women of the time
    4. Add evidence for more emotional statements, such as “tough fights fought by strong women”—identify them then back up with some evidence or a quote.
    5. Identify purpose—awareness and inspiration—early on in the essay, so that it flows more easily and the ideas don’t jump around.
    6. Focus ethos on Reddy’s credibility—Grammy win, etc.

    ReplyDelete