Paper Two Critique:

-One thing we noticed as a group with paper number two was that there is not a clear protest topic object. This paper seemed as if it was more of a lengthy summary rather than a rhetorical analysis. It was a good topic, but it needed to be narrowed down more and also be much more specific.

-It was also hard for our group to find the thesis. The beginning of the paper was skewed and unorganized and the thesis got lost in the jumble. It wasn't clear and concise like a thesis needs to be. The thesis also could have not been as clear because the overall protest topic wasn't specific enough

-The paper length and amount of sources used was another thing that needed much improvement. Because the paper was only two pages long, the writer could not get into enough detail of the protest. There was also only one source used which for an analysis paper, is not enough. Our group finds it hard to believe that you can write a rhetorical analysis with only one source.