Elizabeth Willis
Dr. Steph Brown
English 306
23 February 2016
The
Rainbow Flag
The history of the
Gay Rights Movement is long and winding, yet ever progressing towards a world
of equality for those who identify with the LGBT community. The beginnings of
gay rights advocacy happened early in the 20th century in the United
States: the first American gay rights organization, The Society for Human
Rights, was founded in 1924 (Morris). During this time, gay and lesbian
communities in America tended to be found in small pockets across the country.
Because of this, many citizens were not exposed to the LGBT communities until
during and after World War II, when an explosion of organizations specifically
geared towards gay rights erupted thanks to the war effort bringing different
people together (Morris).
This newfound
social movement had many symbols, signifying an effort that was not organized
nor united. Most notably the “pink triangle from the Nazis,” a symbol used “to
denote gay people” was often used, but it “came from such a horrible place of
murder and Holocaust and Hitler” (Baker). Harvey Milk, a gay politician in San
Francisco, asked Gilbert Baker to create a symbol for the LGBT community that
would carry “a really important message about how important it was to be
visible, how important it was to come out” (Baker). Born in the attic of the
Gay Community Center in San Francisco, the original flag was made by many
volunteers, culminating in an eight-striped rainbow, each strip of fabric
hand-dyed (Zorthian). The flag was first flown in 1978 at the United Nations
Plaza in San Francisco, leading it to become well known in the northern
California area (Baker).
The rainbow flag
came to be a symbol for the LGBT community, fighting for equal human rights
such as being included in federal and state anti-discrimination policies,
holding the right to get married, and removing the stigma of being labeled a
homosexual. The rainbow flag was well received within its target population:
those who identified as LGBT were galvanized to unify underneath the newfound
symbol. The symbol, in a way, made the movement legitimate, calling for those
who were secretive about their sexual orientation to be more open about it.
Over time, the audience grew to be wider than just those who identify as part
of the LGBT community; the flag is a way to show support for the gay and
lesbian community, even if a person self identifies as heterosexual (referred
to as an ally).
It is important
that Gilbert Baker, the mastermind behind the rainbow flag, was a part of the
LGBT community in a very real way. He was a poor drag queen, famous for his
protest banners in favor of the gay movement, who learned to sew because he
could not afford to buy drag clothing (Baker). Baker is truly the essence
behind the LGBT movement, as he did not have wealth or power, yet he still made
a tremendous impact upon his community. One individual, creating a symbol for a
marginalized minority, helping the LGBT community find a collective voice that
would be effective in fighting for equal rights via pathos, ethos, and logos.
A flag is an
interesting symbol to be adopted by a group of people. There is no text, no
explanation of the movement, no real indicators that it belongs to a community.
And yet, the beauty of the flag, especially in the case of the LGBT movement,
is that it does not need explanation in order to be powerful and unifying. The LGBT
community used their rainbow flag to legitimize their movement, to proclaim that
they are a community that has weight and power behind their efforts. Baker has said,
“a flag is different than any other form of art […] it functions in so many
different ways.” He attributes his idea of a flag as the symbol for the LGBT
movement to the inspiration he gained from the American flag. There is very
little monetary value in a single flag, but the significance of a group owning
something that is immediately recognizable to an incredible portion of the
world’s population is invaluable. In general, “a flag points to who [they] are”
as a group: it wordlessly conveys the values that a group holds dear to those
who are on the outside while also acting to join those who are a part of that
community on the inside (Beason). The feeling that Americans get when they look
up at the American flag, that feeling of nationalist pride, works the same way
for the rainbow flag and its followers; this is the pathos that the flag uses.
Baker counted on his fellow community members to have that feeling of being one
group of people, standing in solidarity, working to call to action fighters for
what the group believes in.
At the same time,
Baker helped the flag evoke ethos. He was socioeconomically disadvantaged and without
much influence, but reliable (especially with his Army background). Above all,
Baker was relatable. Anyone within
his community could see some part of themselves in him. If he could believe in
the LGBT movement, so could they. His credibility transferred to the flag,
particularly when the flag’s initial production became a group effort by many
in his community (Baker).
The form of the
rainbow is also important to the message of the flag. If the flag’s purpose is
to unify people that identify as LGBT, the flag must adequately represent everyone
within that population. Baker consciously chose the colors of the flag so that
they represented the values of his community: “pink for sexuality, red for
life, orange for healing, yellow for sunlight, green for nature, turquoise for
magic, blue for serenity, and purple for spirit” (Kabango). Logically, people
are going to want to follow something that is specifically made for them and
that represents them in a real way. This is how Baker created a flag that evokes
logos, reasonably enticing the LGBT community to unite under his symbol. In
addition, Baker has said that the flag’s many colors also represent his
community’s “diversity in terms of race, gender, ages” (Baker). The flag is all
encompassing, so that everyone feels included and welcome while bolstering the feeling
of power that comes with being a part of a large group.
The rainbow flag
turned out to be a complete success. Gilbert said, “I made it in 1978 and I
hoped it would be a great symbol but it has transcended all of that […] because
it became so much bigger than me […] so much bigger than the U.S.” (Baker). The
rainbow flag is now universally recognized as the symbol for the LGBT
community. The struggle for equality has progressed in the U.S. so far that
anti-discrimination laws are now federally enforced and the Supreme Court
recently ruled in favor of same-sex marriage. The Museum of Modern Art, located
in New York City, has even acquired the rainbow flag to be placed in their
“design collection,” indicating that Gilbert’s flag is a fundamental part of
the historical gay rights movement (Baker). Ultimately, a flag evokes all of
the values that a group holds to be true, providing a symbolic object to rally
around: “mere fibers and pigments, the flag means nothing except everything we
believe in” (Beason).
Works
Cited
Baker,
Gilbert. "MoMA Acquires the Rainbow Flag." Interview by Paola
Antonelli and Michelle Fisher. Inside/Out. Museum of Modern Art, 17 June
2015. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
Beason,
Tyrone. "Our Flag, Used as a Symbol of Pride and Protest, Tells a Lot
about Who We Are." The Seattle Times. Frank A. Blethen, 7 July
2015. Web. 20 Feb. 2016.
Kabango,
Shadrach. "Pride Flag Creator Gilbert Baker on the Rainbow's Real
Meaning." CBC News. CBC/Radio Canada, 26 June 2015. Web. 21 Feb.
2016.
Morris,
Bonnie J. "History of Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual Movements." American
Psychological Association. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
Zorthian,
Julia. "How the Rainbow Flag Became an Icon of LGBT Rights." Time.
Time, 25 June 2015. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your paper. I found that you were clear about the object, context, and the purpose it is serving in the LGBT community. From what I understand you identified the audience as gay individuals and those who stand by the pro-gay rights movement. I think it would have been interesting to include information on how the flag has been used to rally against homophobic or anti-gay laws. Perhaps the flag has been used not only to unite people, but also to prove a point or take a stance towards specific opponents.
The organization of your paper was clear and concise. Each paragraph flowed into the next making it easier to read and stay engaged in the material. Many of the quotes you used were excellent sources of evidence for the points you made about the flag. For example, in the second paragraph you included quotes about the use of specific symbols by the Nazis to distinguish homosexuals. This was a powerful quote that succinctly introduced the context of gay symbols. In the seventh paragraph you described the meanings of each individual color of the flag. I thought this was an incredibly important point to include in your paper. However, I do think that discussion of the significance of each color would have been useful at the beginning of the paper as well.
For your revisions, I would only suggest micro level changes to the paper. I think you could talk more about the current status of the rainbow flag since the legalization of gay marriage. Is the flag still as powerful and symbolic as it was prior to this Supreme Court decision? Overall, the flow of the paper was definitely enticing. Each of your topic sentences grabbed my attention. I specifically liked your second thesis regarding ethos, pathos, and logos at the end of paragraph four. I thought it was aptly placed at the end of the paragraph prior to the pathos paragraph. Finally, I think you should include a picture of the rainbow flag at the beginning as a prelude to the rest of your essay.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteReading your paper was enjoyable and educational. I did not know that the Nazi's used a symbol to "denote gay people, as well as the creation of the color striped flag. The entire paper flowed and was very clear from the get go about who your audience was, and what you wanted to accomplish. I like how you introduced the history of the Gay Rights Movement in the beginning. It provided information for the reader that they might have not known.
When it comes to structure in your paper, it is organized well and is very clear. An adjustment that might be able to happen is clearer emphasis of your thesis. Although most writers' thesis' come at the end of the first paragraph, Im unsure if that is where you have put yours. To me, the first sentence of your third paragraph summed up the topic of your paper. Is that true? Im not sure but I look forward to talking to you about your thesis and the location of it!
All in all, this was a great rough draft. You will have to have to make minor adjustments but besides that, you have a solid foundation. I cannot wait to read the final product!
Libby,
ReplyDeleteI found your paper to be engaging and concise! I was so impressed by your citing of the creator of the flag. I can imagine it would be difficult to analyze an inanimate object, but you did it successfully. In addition, your organization flowed nicely and logically. I just have a few suggestions on how you could change a few things:
1. Your introduction gives good context, but jumps right into content. You bring up World War II, and then it’s not mentioned again. Perhaps for the first paragraph, try to introduce concepts you’ll be talking about for the rest of the paper. Use it to bring up your talking points that you expand upon throughout the rest of the essay.
2. Your 4th and 6th paragraphs are very similar. Consider condensing them into one, or change the ideas therein. You could use the information from the 4th paragraph to back up your assertions about Baker’s use of ethos in the 6th.
3. It would be interesting to add in how the flag has been sustained over a few decades so far. Its relevance stands in 2016, which I think is really important—not only was it unifying and symbolic at its genesis, it remains over time and after much change.
4. I had a hard time identifying your theses. Some guiding sentences would be helpful as a reader. Even without them, though, your paper is quite clear—which I think speaks well of your writing ability.
All the changes I thought of are generally at the micro level. I think you have a wonderful foundation and a very strong first draft. It was a delight to read! Great job!
Revisions:
ReplyDeleteRevisions will be on the micro/paragraph level.
1. Add a picture of the rainbow flag at the beginning.
2. Add a thesis for the first part of the essay (the rhetorical situation).
3. Figure out a way to consolidate (or add to) paragraph 4 and paragraph 6.
4. Reword the sentence with the word "legitimate" in it. OR find a way to back up the claim that the movement was not taken seriously until the flag was established.
5. Add more context in terms of the legal status of the lesbian and gay population before/during this movement.
6. Specify gay/lesbian instead of the historically inaccurate term of LGBT.
7. Elaborate on the ethos paragraph. Why did Baker seem relatable to the rest of his target audience?
8. Add to the conclusion about the current state of LGBT affairs. Maybe talk about the current legal matters and how the flag is used today.