Saphire Miramontes
Professor Stephanie BrownENG 306
23 February 2016
Unsolved
Mysteries
“Nunca
mas” – Madres de Plaza de Mayo
Through
the past decades, violence has been a huge topic in much of South American history
due the role of military personnel and government officials within their
society. One of the biggest, violent acts in South American history occurred in
Bueno Aires, Argentina dating from 1976-1983. This specific act was formally
known as the “Dirty War” (Teaching Tolerance 2016). This war began as a result
of the Argentinian military taking over the government in 1976 by overthrowing
President Isabel Peron while they then gained military dictatorship of the
country (Encyclopedia Britannica 2014). Following their overruling, two
separate groups began protesting the military’s new harsh federal policies and
regulations (Encyclopedia Britannica 2014).
One
of the groups consisted of young activists that focused their efforts on
displaying a non-violent protest; meanwhile, the other group known as “left-wing
guerillas,” took pride in violently protesting the military’s new control (Encyclopedia
Britannica 2014). After strong resistance to from the civilians, the military
decided to terrorize them to invoke fear in order to have them obey their
policies and commands. The military’s “secret police” invaded the streets and
started kidnapping, torturing, and killing many young men and women regardless
of their affiliation with the protesting parties (Encyclopedia Britannica 2014).
Eventually, the violence became unavoidable and mothers found their voice by forming
a group, known as “Madres de Plaza de Mayo” (Teaching Tolerance 2016). This
group of mothers took on protesting the war in order to demand information on
the whereabouts of their disappeared and deceased children.
In
the first half of this investigation, an explication of the protest of Madres
de Plaza de Mayo will be further examined first through a series of lens’
relevant to rhetorical situation. Further, the series of explication will be as
follows: protest object, intended audience, relevant context of the protest,
goal and purpose, and the identities of those directly involved in the protest.
Furthermore, in the second part of the examining of the Madres de Plaza de Mayo
protest, an analysis of ethos, pathos, and logos will take place. After
polarizing how the Madres de Plaza de Mayo make use of the three rhetorical
strategies, a closer look at purpose, identity, and protest tactics will be
utilized to describe the effectiveness of their protest.
When
looking at the protest, one would notice that a key object used by the Madres
de Mayo de Plaza was their slogan. In Spanish, it reads “nunca mas” and
translate to English as “never again” (Teaching Tolerance 2016). The meaning
behind the slogan was to represent how the mothers that founded the protest
group, Madres de Plaza de Mayo, would never again allow the military or
government to have reign over their children’s lives. The powerful, short
slogan is believed to therefore have one specific audience - the military
regime of Argentina. The military regime was the targeted audience because they
were responsible for the unethical treatment of the citizens, the disappearance
of young individuals, and the killing of thousands of innocent children
(Encyclopedia Britannica 2014). Moving forward to relevant context of the
protest, it is noted that history from South American countries like Argentina,
more specifically Buenos Aires, have citizens that fear military ruling the
most. Reasons that make this fear valid are experiences like this “Dirty War” and
the extent the military is willing to explore to gain respect and obedience
from their locals.
Moreover,
relevant context to this protest would be that many of the disappeared and
deceased will never be able to return home. The mothers of those children will
never be given the details of their child’s experiences. No other group had the
authority or power to help the mothers seek the information they were pleading
for in order to find their way to one another again. Consequently, the goal of
the Madres de Mayo de Plaza and their clever slogan, was to protest the
military’s attempts to take more children, as well as to demand them to return
or release information concerning the individuals that had already been
captured. The purpose of Madres de Plaza de Mayo and their protest was to bring
awareness of the military corruption that had stained their country’s history
with blood and tears for a dreadful amount of time. To close the first half of
the investigation and in respect of the goals and purpose, a closer look at the
identities tied to those affected by the tragedy and those accountable for it
will be looked at. For the individuals that were affected by the tragedy that
led to the protest, we see a common identity being “mother.” This identity is
important because in cultures, especially Latin cultures, mothers are the
nurturers, healers, sensible family members that share a close bond with their
offspring. Their role in the protest was to be strong, serious, and
justice-seeking leaders for their children; hence, their commitment to their
slogan “nunca mas.” The following identity being “military regime.” Without the
military’s twisted role in society, there would be no purpose for the Madres de
Plaza de Mayo to have protested saying “never again” would they allow children
to surrender to them. Their role as enforcers, immoral leaders, illegal
abductors, and murders during the years 1976-1983 is something that has
permanently altered the image of the military to its country’s citizens and
government.
Now
advancing to the analysis of the protest’s rhetorical strategies, a more
critical investigation will examine the use of ethos, pathos and logos by the
Madres de Plaza de Mayo; also, when comparing the use of these strategies, an
evaluation of the protest’s effectiveness will be addressed. First, the use of
ethos can be seen in the manner the Madres de Plaza de Mayo share their stories
of losing their children. This strategy appeals to their credibility as
mothers, as primary caretakers, and as concerned citizens involved in Dirty War.
Each of those three roles are taken on by one single woman; which goes to show their
invincibility when looking towards their goal of receiving information that the
military refused to disclose (Encyclopedia Britannica 2014).
Additionally,
the strong use of pathos in the protest by the Madres de Plaza de Mayo is very
apparent. For example, in photographs of the protest many of the mothers of the
disappeared and murdered have signs that have the number of lives that had been
taken. Considering the number was as high as 30,000, it can be imagined that the
toll of their lost was heavy (Teaching Tolerance 2016). According to Teaching
Tolerance (2016) it has been reported that one of the Madres de Plaza de Mayo
released this statement, “"What remains in the end is a deep longing for
justice …We're still fighting for those murderers to go to jail. We want you
all to remember what happened to our children so that it never happens again.”
This statement gives the audience a clear vision of the protester’s goals and
purpose. Finally, when analyzing the usage of logos by the Madres de Plaza de
Mayo, an understanding of their name is considered. In respect of their goals
and purpose, the “Madres” meaning “mothers,” formed together and began their
protest at the “Plaza de Mayo” which is the “Presidential Palace,” (Encyclopedia
Britannica 2014). The logistics of this is very ingenious. The Plaza de Mayo is
central of all the towns, which makes it the busiest and most populated area.
It is safe to assume that the location was picked because more people would be
exposed to the protest and would most likely ask questions, join, or support
the protesters. By having more citizens involved in the protest the Madres
hoped to gain a surrender from the Argentina’s military regime.
In
conclusion, the Madres de Plaza de Mayo’s took it upon themselves to be proactive
leaders in seeking righteousness on behalf of their disappeared and deceased
children. Moreover, the Argentinian military found it necessary during their
seven year ruling to treat the country’s citizens harmfully and unlawfully. In
the protest we see two clear identities being tested; one being the mothers of
the children, and the second being military regime that serve as assaulters. Rhetorically,
the goal of the Madres de Plaza de Mayo was effective in the idea that they
appealed to all three protest strategies of ethos, pathos, and logos. Supplementary,
to their effectiveness rhetorically, the protesters were also effective
historically as their legacy is still well known in Buenos Aires, Argentina
today. Hence, the mothers ability to not allow such trajectories to occur “nunca
mas” or “never again,” it can be said that their protesting met their goals and
fulfilled their purpose altogether.
Works
Cited
“Dirty War.” Encyclopedia
Britannica. Web 19 February 2016. Retrieved from:
http://www.britannica.com/event/Dirty-War
"Teaching Tolerance: Madres de Plaza
de Mayo.” Web. 07 February 2016. Retrieved from:
http://www.tolerance.org/activity/madres-de-plaza-de-mayo
"Madres de Plaza de Mayo: 36 anos de
lucha." Web. 07 February 2016. Retrieved from:
http://www.almagrotubarrio.com.ar/?p=1693
Your explanation of the movement is really well written and your essay is very well organized. That being said, I think that your subject is too general. You start out strong with using the motto and analyzing it, but then you reference other objects of protest (the pictures, etc...). I would say stick with one picture or with the motto to give yourself an object you can really delve deep in analysis with.
ReplyDeleteHello Saphire,
ReplyDeleteI am left a little bit confused with the third and sixth paragraphs, and am unfamiliar with this kind of structure for an essay. It is implied that you'll cover all of the things mentioned in those paragraphs because that was the point of the assignment, so reading these things seems unnecessarily redundant. As a reader, it is a bit strange to read what you intend to do instead of being persuaded by your interpretation of the rhetoric in the protest.
Speaking of which, I have a difficult time understanding what your item of protest actually is. The essay feels like a survey of events that happened in relation to your item, as well as its founders, but I don't feel that you have enough analysis on the rhetorical strategies used by Madres de Plaza de Mayo.
The area in which you've done a good job is in providing context. I have a clear understanding of the situation, I can see who Madres de Plaza de Mayo are up against, and I have a sense of who Madres de Plaza de Mayo are. The problem is that I don't know exactly how the group is protesting. I think that once the readers get a grasp of that, they'll be able to be persuaded a bit more easily. It would also be easier to define what rhetorical appeals were used, and also specifically how they were used, as well as an analysis of how the use of that particular rhetorical strategy worked or didn't work in service of the protest.
Revision Plan for “Madres de Plaza de Mayo”
ReplyDelete• Take out and revise sections that state “what will be discussed” as the intent of the paper.
• Move content of second paragraph up to know what the paper will be focusing on.
• Translate the slogan in the first two paragraphs.
o Focus on what was used and what the purpose of “nunca mas” is by the mothers.
o Include what the symbolism of the slogan is.
• Incorporate this:
o Ethos = mothers have the right to demand the information.
o Pathos = emotional bond of mother and child from motherhood; shared experience with all mothers around the world.
Hello Sapphire,
ReplyDeleteAs far I understand, this paper is focused on mothers protesting the violence inflicted upon their children by the secret police.
I think you should introduce the real topic of your paper a bit earlier. The translation of the mother’s slogan and the reason why they are protesting, are all key to include in your intro paragraph.
The first paragraph does not talk about the main point of your paper. You give us an important historical background on your topic, but I would place a lot of that information after the introductory paragraph.
I thought the body and conclusion of your paper was good.
Overall your paper seemed well composed for a rough draft. I enjoyed reading about the “Unsolved Mysteries”. I was completely unfamiliar with this topic until I read your paper. After I finished I felt very informed.
Overall sentence structure was pretty good! Keep up the great work it is looking great.