Sydney
Moody
Dr.
Brown
English
306
22
February 2016
The Balaclava:
The Mask that Bears All
Shining a light on egregious acts of
inequality and oppressive ruling on apart of the Russian government, the band
Pussy Riot has established themselves as a fearless protest group enthralled
with feminism and social freedom. The members of this group are all female and
regularly wear vibrant outfits. What truly distinguishes this band from other
protest groups is their use of the balaclava, a colorful rendition of a ski
mask traditionally associated with illegal covert activities. The balaclavas
adorned by this group have the traditional cutouts of a ski mask, but vary in
color and material.
Why wear such odd headgear and leave your
identity undisclosed? One would think an infamous band of feminist protestors
would proudly show their faces in defiance of their oppressors. Interestingly,
the protestors who adorn themselves with balaclavas draw more attention to
themselves than they may have otherwise. The colorful masks succeed in two
aims: protecting the identity of the protestors and uniting them as a collective
protest group. The use of facial embellishments such as the balaclava may have
proven to be a useful way to unite protestors during the Seattle WTO protests
that accrued a plethora of violent activities (DeLuca et. al, 183). This is
exactly what the balaclavas have done in Russia. The masks have given a common
face to a movement. Pussy Riot intends for the balaclavas to be seen and worn by
others who are in favor of “feminism, gay rights, improved treatment of
prisoners and more transparency in the Russian political system” (Gladstone).
The band welcomes new members who support their movement to wear the balaclava,
as it is essentially the team uniform, bringing the group increased publicity
and recognition.
To truly understand why Pussy Riot and
band supporters have chosen the balaclava, one must understand the consequences
of being caught protesting by the Russian government and subsequently silenced.
In an NPR interview, Masha Gessen described the miserable prison experience of
Nadezhda Tolokonanikova, one of three Pussy Riot members
who were given a prison sentence for protesting in a popular Russian church. In
the interview, Gessen described how female prisoners are “systematically denied
the right to wash themselves” (Gessen). Protecting one’s anonymity is important
to the members of Pussy Riot and those who support their cause in Russia. In a
counterintuitive manner, the members of the movement are freeing themselves and
their voices by wearing these masks. They are building a public sphere “imagined
as a place of embodied voices” (DeLuca et. al, 186).
The purpose of the balaclava is to
simultaneously create a unanimous identity while masking individual faces.
However, within recent years three figures have become the prominent faces of
Pussy Riot with the arrests of Maria Alekhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, and
Yekaterina Samutsevich (Cadwalladr). When these women were arrested for
publicly critiquing the Russian government, the United States tuned in to the
voices of the protesters. Initially, the band seemed focused on getting the
attention of Russian citizens, specifically those feeling exploited or perhaps that
their rights were being denied by a tyrannical leader. The movement has since
spread to the United States with the Free Pussy Riot movement and the help of
many American musical artists (Amnesty International).
The members of Pussy Riot have
established themselves as informed political activists who have managed to
enrage and enthrall movement sympathizers. Pussy Riot has chosen to elicit the
use of several rhetorical strategies including ethos and pathos in their
movement to evoke change within Russian politics. To be convincing to Russian
officials, the members also have to be convincing to potential movement
sympathizers and their balaclavas are essential to that act of persuasion.
The balaclava evokes pathos immediately.
Those unfamiliar with Pussy Riot and their movement may not recognize the
attire, but it continues to draw public attention. Traditionally, those in ski
masks are feared individuals associated with criminal activity, but the rainbow
of colors represented in a sea of Pussy Riot protestors jolts that assumption. As
previously discussed, the masks create a sense of solidarity amongst rioters.
Simply wearing a balaclava is enough to make a profound stance in support of
both the band and the movement itself.
The balaclava is additionally a powerful
source of ethos because spreads the sentiment of the movement “…not through the
forces of wealth or arms, but through the force of persuasion” (Griffin, 10).
Once the movement spread to the United States, artists like Madonna have
sported the balaclava in an effort to convince Russian officials to release the
band members from prison (BBC). What’s truly notable about the ethos of the
balaclavas is how they displace the concept of hierarchy within the movement
itself to give credibility to their criticisms of the Russian government. By
wearing a balaclava, even a famous individual associates themselves with the
faceless community. Under the protection of this mask, it does not matter if
you are rich, famous, poor, or mundane. Through
the use of the balaclava, Pussy Riot extends the depth of their movement “…not
through the forces of wealth or arms, but through the force of persuasion”
(Griffin, 10).
Two members of Pussy Riot left their
balaclavas behind when discussing their tours of American prison systems on the
Colbert Report in 2014. Two of the
three women who were convicted for their protest, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Maria
Alekhina, spent two years behind the bars of a deplorable Russian prisons (Gessen
Interview). Their personal encounter with the disgraceful conditions of Russian
prisons has made these women admirable advocates of the imprisoned. Now these
women, whose identities are fully known, can use their individual faces to
support those in Russia who go unmentioned and become forgotten within the
Russian judicial system.
Understandably, the band has neglected to
use the rhetorical strategy known as logos in their movement. The balaclavas, songs,
and behavior of the protestors demonstrate much more of an emotional appeal
than one of logic. While under the rule of such an authoritarian government, it
is more beneficial to the movement to focus on the enraged feelings of the
citizens as opposed to statistical figures.
The goal of the Pussy Riot movement has
been to point out the unbelievable realities of the Russian government using
their balaclavas as symbols of the band’s revolutionary authority and powerful
influence. The masks meet many of the needs of the movement including
protecting the identities of the protestors and creating a source of
commonality amongst them.
Works Cited
"Adele, U2, Madonna, Yoko Ono, Radiohead, Patti Smith,
Bruce Springsteen, Ke$ha, Sir Paul McCartney and Sting Unite With More
Than 100 Musicians to Call for Release of Pussy Riot"amnesty.org, 22
July 2013. Web. 20 February 2016.
DeLuca, Michael and Jennifer Peeples. "From Public
Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the "Violence" of
Seattle." Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest. By Charles E.
Morris III and Stephen H. Brown. 3rd ed. 183-203. Desire 2 Learn. Web. 20 Feb.
2016.
Gessen, Masha.
Interview with NPR’s Fresh Air Host Terry Gross. The ‘Pussy Riot’ Arrests, And The Crackdown
that Followed (2014). Web. 20 February 2016.
Gladstone, Rick. "Pussy Riot Members Take Tour to New
York." nytimes.com, 5 February 2014. Web. 20 February 2016.
Griffin, Leland M. “From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the "Violence" of Seattle." Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest. By Charles E. Morris III and Stephen H. Brown. 3rd ed. 183-203. Desire 2 Learn. Web. 20 February 2016.
Cadwalladr, Carole. "Pussy Riot: Will Vladimir Putin Regret Taking on Russia's Cool Women Punks?" The Guardian. 28 July 2012. Web. 20 February 2016.
"Madonna Appeal over Pussy Riot." BBC News. 8 August 2012. Web. 20 February 2016.
"Pussy Riot Pt. 1 and Pt. 2." Interview by Stephen Colbert. The Colbert Report. Comedy Central. New York, New York, 4 February 2014. Web. 20 February 2016.
Griffin, Leland M. “From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the "Violence" of Seattle." Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest. By Charles E. Morris III and Stephen H. Brown. 3rd ed. 183-203. Desire 2 Learn. Web. 20 February 2016.
Cadwalladr, Carole. "Pussy Riot: Will Vladimir Putin Regret Taking on Russia's Cool Women Punks?" The Guardian. 28 July 2012. Web. 20 February 2016.
"Madonna Appeal over Pussy Riot." BBC News. 8 August 2012. Web. 20 February 2016.
"Pussy Riot Pt. 1 and Pt. 2." Interview by Stephen Colbert. The Colbert Report. Comedy Central. New York, New York, 4 February 2014. Web. 20 February 2016.
I'm not sure what's going on with the alignment of my last few citations. I have tried to fix it several times, and for some reason it's not working.
ReplyDeleteSydney,
ReplyDelete1. The purpose of the balaclava is very clear in paragraph 2, but maybe more context when it comes to the cruelty of the Russian government instead of taking for granted that your reader is aware of Russia’s oppression. You do talk about it a little in paragraph 3, but very briefly. Half of the purpose of the balaclava is to hide identity, so I think you could expand a little more (by providing specific examples of the cruelty) on why that is such an important point.
2. I’m not sure if this is necessary, but it would be interesting to put a sentence or two in the context about what exactly Pussy Riot is. I didn’t know that it was a band (and not just a protest movement) until I looked it up on the internet. You could also add a picture of the band in their balaclavas to provide a visual.
3. In regards to the second thesis, it was more of a paragraph than a sentence. I think that paragraph 5 could be pared down to just one sentence so that it is clearer to your audience what you will be talking about.
4. Most of the essay is very clear, but in paragraph 2, I felt it was a little arbitrary to throw in the quote by DeLuca et al and I think it makes that paragraph less clear compared to the rest of your essay. If you do want to use that quote, maybe you can rearrange paragraph 2 so that the quote is at the beginning or the end as an example for how the balaclava could be used effectively in another protest.
5. For the concluding paragraph (or even the second to last paragraph) maybe you could expand on what successes or failures the Pussy Riot has seen with the Balaclava. Has Russia changed any of its restrictive laws or practices? Has it incited any major protests or riots since being used? Or are all of those events still to come because the balaclava as a symbol is still relatively new? Maybe just commenting on the success (or lack thereof) of the symbol would be a nice way to end the essay.
6. Overall, I thought the essay was clear and at a good length. The structure and organization of the essay flows well and is intuitive. Really I only had minor critiques, so the revision will definitely be at the micro level! Great job!
Libby
Sydney,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading about this topic. This is an ongoing issue that has had an impact on Russia and around the world.
In your first paragraph, you do a good job providing information for the reader but it might be more effective if you dive deep into the topic of Russia's oppression towards protest and gay rights. You're off to a good start but it needs just a bit more information for your reader.
In your second paragraph you explain the masks as headgear. Because you showed me a picture in class, I know exactly what that balaclava's look like. When you say "headgear", the reader might be misled. To combat this, simply putting a picture of the band in the masks would be able to clearly represent what the protestors are wearing.
Also, I'm unsure of your thesis and its location? Im sure in class you could clearly point it out to me! Do you have a secondary thesis as well? These questions cannot be answered here but I look forward to asking you about them in class.
Lastly, I think that the lack of logos could be explained a bit more. Clearly the band and other protestors have all stayed away from the use of protest. You skim over the subject of it, but if you did more research there could be more reasoning and explanation.
You did a great job with your structure, organization, and explanation of the Pussy Riot. It was very educational and I wanted to keep reading more and more! The critiques are are in the micro level and Im sure that when you complete revisions, then it will be great!
Sydney,
ReplyDeleteI found your paper to be clear and concise. It was easy to follow and you made your points well. Here are some suggestions on how it could still improve:
1. In the 7th paragraph, you use the same Griffin quote twice “…not through the forces of wealth or arms, but through the force of persuasion”—choose in which location it seems to work better and take the other one out.
2. I think you could find some logos. You actually use it a bit earlier when you talk about why the members of the band and its sympathizers use the balaclava. It’s logical as well as emotionally evocative for them to use the masks the way they do. If you could expand on that, I think your essay would be much stronger.
3. I had some trouble finding your theses. Since you already wrote your essay, it would be easy to put in some guiding statements for your first thesis and something to introduce your discussion of ethos, pathos, and logos.
4. You do a good job of describing what Pussy Riot does and why, but it would be helpful to describe more of what they are. You briefly mentioned how they are a band and social movement—if you could expand both of those and connect them together, it would give a lot of clarity for your reader.
5. The main thing I found missing was context. Could you give more background about the cruelty of the Russian government? Try to lead the reader to see why Pussy Riot was necessary. What specific events/actions lead to their formation? Showing plainly the horror of what happens in Russia will make the necessity and risk of Pussy Riot much more clear.
Overall, your paper was straightforward and easy to read. As someone who had no prior knowledge on this subject, you did a good job of introducing and delineating a movement that was altogether unfamiliar to me before.
revision plan:
ReplyDelete- add a picture of the balaclava
- update the context in paragraph 2 so that it is more detailed and thorough
- introduce multiple audiences more clearly and earlier on in paper
- remove unnecessary quotes and add something more appropriate
- update paragraph 7 topic sentence
- provide more context for the reference to the American prison system
- add to logos section and explain why it isn't used
- explain how unmasking affected the balaclava and what it resembles
- make first thesis more clear and obvious
- end with how successful the balaclava has been for the movement
- make it clear that Pussy Riot represents band and movement